Top 100 Global Websites — AI Visibility Ranking

How ready are global technology companies for the AI era?

We analyzed 100 leading global technology websites to measure their visibility in AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. The results reveal which companies are positioned to be cited by AI — and which risk being bypassed.

Your web is not there? Check AI Readiness online →
100 domains
Domain i
The website domain analyzed for AI visibility.
Change i
Position change vs. previous scan.
Overall Score i
Composite score: (AI Readiness + SEO Foundation + Citation Readiness) / 3. ≥70 = PASS.
Status i
PASS = Overall Score ≥70. FAIL = critical blocking issues.
+
https://www.listkit.io
— 0
RANK CHANGE
#1 → #1
90.7
AI bot detection is blocking Gemini, risking competitor content being cited instead of official data.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.listkit.io
AI Readiness i
100.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
92.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
80.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
100.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI bot detection is blocking Gemini, risking competitor content being cited instead of official data.

+
https://www.hex.tech
↑ +21
RANK CHANGE
#23 → #2
89.7
AI visibility is severely limited on hex.tech, forcing AI models to rely on third-party scrapers and potentially inaccurate competitor data.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.hex.tech
AI Readiness i
100.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
80.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
89.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
100.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
100.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
90.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
90.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility is severely limited on hex.tech, forcing AI models to rely on third-party scrapers and potentially inaccurate competitor data.

+
https://www.xata.io
↑ +37
RANK CHANGE
#40 → #3
84.0
AI visibility is compromised, risking Gemini's reliance on competitor data instead of official Xata.io content.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.xata.io
AI Readiness i
88.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
80.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
84.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
80.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
55.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility is compromised, risking Gemini's reliance on competitor data instead of official Xata.io content.

+
https://www.heygen.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#3 → #4
82.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and search relevance.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.heygen.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
92.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
90.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
95.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
95.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
77.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and search relevance.

+
https://www.dub.co
↓ -3
RANK CHANGE
#2 → #5
82.3
Indexability issues → AI models may cite competitor content instead of your official site for user queries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.dub.co
AI Readiness i
80.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
80.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
87.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
80.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
70.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
65.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues → AI models may cite competitor content instead of your official site for user queries.

+
https://www.commonroom.io
↑ +2
RANK CHANGE
#8 → #6
80.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models may rely on competitor data or scrapers, diminishing visibility and potentially misinforming users about your business.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.commonroom.io
AI Readiness i
72.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
82.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
87.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
75.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
85.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
62.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models may rely on competitor data or scrapers, diminishing visibility and potentially misinforming users about your business.

+
https://www.sentry.io
— 0
RANK CHANGE
#7 → #7
77.0
Content quality insufficient → AI agents will use competitor data, impacting Sentry's visibility and search rankings.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.sentry.io
AI Readiness i
85.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
57.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
89.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
75.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
65.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
70.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
65.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Content quality insufficient → AI agents will use competitor data, impacting Sentry's visibility and search rankings.

+
https://www.regie.ai
↓ -4
RANK CHANGE
#4 → #8
76.3
Indexability blockers and poor content quality → AI models will ignore regie.ai, leading them to cite competitors for crucial business information.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.regie.ai
AI Readiness i
74.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
82.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
70.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
90.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability blockers and poor content quality → AI models will ignore regie.ai, leading them to cite competitors for crucial business information.

+
https://www.gorgias.com
↓ -3
RANK CHANGE
#6 → #9
76.3
Missing canonical tags → AI models like Gemini may ignore your site, leading them to cite competitor content for customer inquiries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.gorgias.com
AI Readiness i
92.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
58.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
79.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
100.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Missing canonical tags → AI models like Gemini may ignore your site, leading them to cite competitor content for customer inquiries.

+
https://www.loops.so
↑ +11
RANK CHANGE
#21 → #10
75.0
Low AI content quality detected → Gemini may cite competitor sites instead of loops.so for information, impacting brand visibility and lead generation.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.loops.so
AI Readiness i
69.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
77.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
79.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
70.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
100.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
67.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality detected → Gemini may cite competitor sites instead of loops.so for information, impacting brand visibility and lead generation.

+
https://www.usebruno.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#5 → #11
74.7
Aggressive bot blocking detected → AI agents like Gemini will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.usebruno.com
AI Readiness i
74.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
65.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
85.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
80.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
65.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
85.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
82.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Aggressive bot blocking detected → AI agents like Gemini will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.

+
https://www.workos.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#11 → #12
74.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will miss WorkOS data, potentially favoring competitors for user queries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.workos.com
AI Readiness i
77.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
57.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
90.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
75.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
100.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
65.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
80.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will miss WorkOS data, potentially favoring competitors for user queries.

+
https://www.front.com
— 0
RANK CHANGE
#13 → #13
74.0
Insufficient content quality → AI agents will cite competitor data, bypassing your official site and losing visibility.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.front.com
AI Readiness i
67.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
83.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
72.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
45.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
60.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI agents will cite competitor data, bypassing your official site and losing visibility.

+
https://www.motherduck.com
↑ +13
RANK CHANGE
#27 → #14
72.0
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and authority.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.motherduck.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
83.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
81.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
90.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
85.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
65.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and authority.

+
https://www.shortcut.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#14 → #15
72.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.shortcut.com
AI Readiness i
74.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
62.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
80.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
70.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.linear.app
↓ -4
RANK CHANGE
#12 → #16
71.7
Poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site and use competitor data, impacting visibility and search rankings.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.linear.app
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
82.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
68.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
65.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
85.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
77.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
AUDIO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site and use competitor data, impacting visibility and search rankings.

+
https://www.preset.io
↑ +2
RANK CHANGE
#19 → #17
71.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking preset.io, leading them to cite competitor content instead.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.preset.io
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
83.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
65.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
85.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
77.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking preset.io, leading them to cite competitor content instead.

+
https://www.planetscale.com
↓ -9
RANK CHANGE
#9 → #18
71.0
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on third-party scrapers, risking inaccurate information and competitor promotion.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.planetscale.com
AI Readiness i
70.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
70.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
50.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
100.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
85.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on third-party scrapers, risking inaccurate information and competitor promotion.

+
https://www.penpot.app
↓ -4
RANK CHANGE
#15 → #19
70.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore penpot.app, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your product.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.penpot.app
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
84.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
91.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
75.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
70.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore penpot.app, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your product.

+
https://www.gladly.com
↑ +80
RANK CHANGE
#100 → #20
70.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore Gladly, potentially citing competitor content for user queries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.gladly.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
87.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
72.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
60.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore Gladly, potentially citing competitor content for user queries.

+
https://www.together.ai
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#16 → #21
70.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
PASS
// Detailed metrics — https://www.together.ai
AI Readiness i
68.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
75.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.liveblocks.io
↑ +6
RANK CHANGE
#28 → #22
69.7
Low AI content quality → Gemini will favor competitor data, impacting your brand's visibility and search relevance.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.liveblocks.io
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
83.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
61.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
40.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
57.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality → Gemini will favor competitor data, impacting your brand's visibility and search relevance.

+
https://www.smartlead.ai
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#18 → #23
69.3
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring your site, leading them to cite competitor content for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.smartlead.ai
AI Readiness i
64.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
68.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
76.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
70.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
65.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring your site, leading them to cite competitor content for user queries.

+
https://www.railway.app
↑ +69
RANK CHANGE
#93 → #24
69.0
AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.railway.app
AI Readiness i
67.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
70.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
45.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.

+
https://www.sparkmailapp.com
↑ +1
RANK CHANGE
#26 → #25
69.0
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to cite competitor content for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.sparkmailapp.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
85.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
70.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
100.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
85.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to cite competitor content for user queries.

+
https://www.anyscale.com
↑ +26
RANK CHANGE
#52 → #26
69.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models ignoring Anyscale, leading them to cite competitors for information about your platform.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.anyscale.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
82.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
81.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
80.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
50.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models ignoring Anyscale, leading them to cite competitors for information about your platform.

+
https://www.resend.com
↑ +6
RANK CHANGE
#33 → #27
68.7
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and control over information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.resend.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
83.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
71.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
65.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and control over information.

+
https://www.trychroma.com
↑ +3
RANK CHANGE
#31 → #28
68.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.trychroma.com
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
87.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
60.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
57.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.beautiful.ai
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#24 → #29
67.7
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors being cited for your product information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.beautiful.ai
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
76.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
69.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
75.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors being cited for your product information.

+
https://www.render.com
↑ +13
RANK CHANGE
#43 → #30
67.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will miss key information, potentially referencing competitor sites for your product details.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.render.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
68.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
82.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
55.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
90.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
80.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
50.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will miss key information, potentially referencing competitor sites for your product details.

+
https://www.stytch.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#30 → #31
67.3
Poor content quality → AI models will ignore stytch.com, leading them to cite competitor data and misrepresent your offerings.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.stytch.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
77.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
60.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
62.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality → AI models will ignore stytch.com, leading them to cite competitor data and misrepresent your offerings.

+
https://www.neon.tech
↑ +64
RANK CHANGE
#96 → #32
67.0
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and authority.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.neon.tech
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
61.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and authority.

+
https://www.plane.so
↓ -13
RANK CHANGE
#20 → #33
66.7
Poor content quality detected → AI agents will rely on competitor data, diminishing your site's visibility and authority.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.plane.so
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
82.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
53.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality detected → AI agents will rely on competitor data, diminishing your site's visibility and authority.

+
https://www.modal.com
↑ +60
RANK CHANGE
#94 → #34
66.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.modal.com
AI Readiness i
68.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
61.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
71.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
60.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
93.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
50.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.mintlify.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#29 → #35
66.7
Low AI visibility score → AI models may use competitor data instead of your official content.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.mintlify.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
88.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
47.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI visibility score → AI models may use competitor data instead of your official content.

+
https://www.usemotion.com
↓ -19
RANK CHANGE
#17 → #36
66.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your site's visibility and authority.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.usemotion.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
68.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
66.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
85.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
95.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
77.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your site's visibility and authority.

+
https://www.cal.com
↓ -15
RANK CHANGE
#22 → #37
66.3
Low AI content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.cal.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
72.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
62.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
95.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
70.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
40.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
62.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.

+
https://www.sunsama.com
↑ +10
RANK CHANGE
#48 → #38
65.7
Missing H1 heading → AI models may struggle to understand content, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your offerings.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.sunsama.com
AI Readiness i
69.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
58.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
70.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
70.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
47.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Missing H1 heading → AI models may struggle to understand content, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your offerings.

+
https://www.baseten.co
↓ -7
RANK CHANGE
#32 → #39
64.3
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.baseten.co
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
72.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
56.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.

+
https://www.clerk.com
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#35 → #40
63.3
Poor content quality and missing structured data → AI models will ignore clerk.com, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your services.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.clerk.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
50.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality and missing structured data → AI models will ignore clerk.com, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your services.

+
https://www.materialize.com
↑ +12
RANK CHANGE
#53 → #41
63.3
Poor content quality and missing structured data → AI models will struggle to understand your site, potentially leading them to rely on competitor information for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.materialize.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
50.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
69.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
40.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality and missing structured data → AI models will struggle to understand your site, potentially leading them to rely on competitor information for user queries.

+
https://www.upstash.com
↑ +5
RANK CHANGE
#47 → #42
63.0
Low AI visibility detected → AI agents will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.upstash.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI visibility detected → AI agents will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.

+
https://www.akiflow.com
↓ -4
RANK CHANGE
#39 → #43
63.0
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore akiflow.com, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your product.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.akiflow.com
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
63.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
74.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
95.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
55.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore akiflow.com, leading them to cite competitor sites for information about your product.

+
https://www.fly.io
↑ +16
RANK CHANGE
#60 → #44
62.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore fly.io, leading them to cite competitors for critical information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.fly.io
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
82.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore fly.io, leading them to cite competitors for critical information.

+
https://www.metabase.com
↓ -4
RANK CHANGE
#41 → #45
62.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook your site, leading to competitors and scrapers dominating search results for your brand.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.metabase.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
75.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
69.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
65.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook your site, leading to competitors and scrapers dominating search results for your brand.

+
https://www.glideapps.com
↑ +3
RANK CHANGE
#49 → #46
62.3
Poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, citing competitors and risking data scraping by third parties.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.glideapps.com
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
77.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
62.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
65.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
40.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
80.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
62.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, citing competitors and risking data scraping by third parties.

+
https://www.clay.com
↑ +7
RANK CHANGE
#54 → #47
62.3
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore Clay.com, favoring competitor content for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.clay.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
73.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
60.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore Clay.com, favoring competitor content for user queries.

+
https://www.warmly.ai
↓ -3
RANK CHANGE
#45 → #48
61.7
Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors or scrapers being cited for your product information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.warmly.ai
AI Readiness i
52.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
66.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
70.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
60.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors or scrapers being cited for your product information.

+
https://www.appcues.com
↑ +17
RANK CHANGE
#66 → #49
61.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking your site, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.appcues.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
74.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
70.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
50.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking your site, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.

+
https://www.rive.app
↓ -25
RANK CHANGE
#25 → #50
61.3
Poor content quality → AI models will ignore Rive.app, leading them to cite competitor data and miss crucial information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.rive.app
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
52.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
100.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality → AI models will ignore Rive.app, leading them to cite competitor data and miss crucial information.

+
https://www.descript.com
↓ -15
RANK CHANGE
#36 → #51
61.3
Poor content quality and missing data → AI models will struggle to understand your site, potentially citing competitors instead of your official information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.descript.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
52.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality and missing data → AI models will struggle to understand your site, potentially citing competitors instead of your official information.

+
https://www.june.so
↓ -18
RANK CHANGE
#34 → #52
61.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring june.so, leading them to cite competitors for information about your services.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.june.so
AI Readiness i
61.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
90.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring june.so, leading them to cite competitors for information about your services.

+
https://www.runwayml.com
↓ -7
RANK CHANGE
#46 → #53
61.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking RunwayML, leading them to cite competitor content instead.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.runwayml.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
69.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
80.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
40.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking RunwayML, leading them to cite competitor content instead.

+
https://www.spline.design
↓ -10
RANK CHANGE
#44 → #54
60.7
Insufficient video content metadata → AI models will struggle to understand your offerings, potentially referencing competitor sites for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.spline.design
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
85.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient video content metadata → AI models will struggle to understand your offerings, potentially referencing competitor sites for information.

+
https://www.replicate.com
↑ +40
RANK CHANGE
#95 → #55
59.7
Low AI content quality → Gemini may cite competitor sites instead of replicate.com for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.replicate.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
47.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
95.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality → Gemini may cite competitor sites instead of replicate.com for information.

+
https://www.bubble.io
↑ +2
RANK CHANGE
#58 → #56
59.7
Insufficient content quality → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.bubble.io
AI Readiness i
63.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
60.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
56.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
55.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
50.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
60.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
ORGANIZATION
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.

+
https://www.rb2b.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#56 → #57
59.7
Indexability and content quality issues → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.rb2b.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
65.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
70.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
65.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
60.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability and content quality issues → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.rilldata.com
↑ +5
RANK CHANGE
#63 → #58
59.3
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing Rilldata.com for competitor data.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.rilldata.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
64.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
70.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
60.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing Rilldata.com for competitor data.

+
https://www.instantly.ai
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#57 → #59
59.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.instantly.ai
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
60.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
70.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
45.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
40.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
40.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will struggle to understand your site, leading them to rely on competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.mezmo.com
↓ -9
RANK CHANGE
#51 → #60
59.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore Mezmo.com, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.mezmo.com
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
72.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
48.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore Mezmo.com, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.

+
https://www.superhuman.com
↓ -23
RANK CHANGE
#38 → #61
58.7
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.superhuman.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
56.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
55.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
50.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
93.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
47.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's online presence and search visibility.

+
https://www.obsidian.md
↓ -12
RANK CHANGE
#50 → #62
57.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about Obsidian.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.obsidian.md
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
70.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
100.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about Obsidian.

+
https://www.buildwithfern.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#62 → #63
57.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook your site, leading them to cite competitors for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.buildwithfern.com
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
65.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
51.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
40.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook your site, leading them to cite competitors for user queries.

+
https://www.logrocket.com
↓ -22
RANK CHANGE
#42 → #64
57.3
Low AI content quality detected → AI agents will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and authority.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.logrocket.com
AI Readiness i
65.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
59.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
48.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
60.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
93.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality detected → AI agents will rely on competitor data, diminishing your brand's visibility and authority.

+
https://www.zilliz.com
↓ -28
RANK CHANGE
#37 → #65
56.7
Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing Zilliz's visibility and potentially misinforming users.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.zilliz.com
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
63.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
59.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
65.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
55.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
85.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
67.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Insufficient content quality → AI models will rely on competitor data, diminishing Zilliz's visibility and potentially misinforming users.

+
https://www.turso.tech
↓ -7
RANK CHANGE
#59 → #66
55.3
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore turso.tech, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.turso.tech
AI Readiness i
45.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
72.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
30.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore turso.tech, leading them to cite competitors or scrapers for information about your offerings.

+
https://www.cube.dev
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#65 → #67
54.7
Poor content quality and missing video details → AI models will struggle to understand your offerings, potentially referencing competitor sites for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.cube.dev
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
66.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
50.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
80.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
69.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality and missing video details → AI models will struggle to understand your offerings, potentially referencing competitor sites for information.

+
https://www.decodable.co
↑ +1
RANK CHANGE
#69 → #68
54.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing your site, leading to competitors being cited for your information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.decodable.co
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing your site, leading to competitors being cited for your information.

+
https://www.tavus.io
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#68 → #69
54.0
Indexability issues and poor content structure → AI models will struggle to understand tavus.io, leading them to rely on competitor data or scrapers for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.tavus.io
AI Readiness i
57.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
65.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
40.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
70.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
35.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content structure → AI models will struggle to understand tavus.io, leading them to rely on competitor data or scrapers for information.

+
https://www.convex.dev
↓ -9
RANK CHANGE
#61 → #70
53.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will miss your site, leading them to cite competitors and scrapers for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.convex.dev
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
51.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
70.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will miss your site, leading them to cite competitors and scrapers for information.

+
https://www.evidence.dev
↓ -7
RANK CHANGE
#64 → #71
53.7
Indexability and content quality issues severely limit AI visibility → Gemini and other AI models will likely ignore your site, relying on competitor data or scrapers for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.evidence.dev
AI Readiness i
45.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
70.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
46.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
30.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
95.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
35.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability and content quality issues severely limit AI visibility → Gemini and other AI models will likely ignore your site, relying on competitor data or scrapers for information.

+
https://www.sprig.com
↑ +1
RANK CHANGE
#73 → #72
53.7
AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.sprig.com
AI Readiness i
53.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
41.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
70.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
60.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.

+
https://www.highlight.io
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#71 → #73
52.3
Indexability and content quality issues risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data or scrapers for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.highlight.io
AI Readiness i
36.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
73.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
48.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
70.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability and content quality issues risk AI models overlooking your site, leading them to rely on competitor data or scrapers for information.

+
https://www.langchain.com
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#72 → #74
52.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking Langchain.com, potentially leading them to cite competitor content for information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.langchain.com
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini overlooking Langchain.com, potentially leading them to cite competitor content for information.

+
https://www.reflect.app
↓ -8
RANK CHANGE
#67 → #75
51.7
Poor content quality → AI models will ignore Reflect.app, leading them to use competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.reflect.app
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
53.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
54.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
70.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
48.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
67.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Poor content quality → AI models will ignore Reflect.app, leading them to use competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.redpanda.com
↓ -1
RANK CHANGE
#75 → #76
51.0
AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.redpanda.com
AI Readiness i
44.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
60.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
49.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
20.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
100.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
50.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
75.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
45.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.

+
https://www.plasmic.app
↓ -22
RANK CHANGE
#55 → #77
50.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook plasmic.app, favoring competitor content for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.plasmic.app
AI Readiness i
36.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
72.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
44.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
70.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
95.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
91.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will overlook plasmic.app, favoring competitor content for user queries.

+
https://www.llamaindex.ai
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#76 → #78
50.3
Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to use competitor data for user queries.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.llamaindex.ai
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
63.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
48.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
65.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
80.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
55.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
35.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading them to use competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.flutterflow.io
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#74 → #79
49.7
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents like Gemini bypassing your site, leading them to cite competitor content instead of your official information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.flutterflow.io
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
67.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
42.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
75.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
60.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents like Gemini bypassing your site, leading them to cite competitor content instead of your official information.

+
https://www.mem.ai
↓ -3
RANK CHANGE
#77 → #80
49.3
Low AI content quality → Gemini and GPT will ignore mem.ai, citing competitor data and risking third-party AI visibility.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.mem.ai
AI Readiness i
53.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
52.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
43.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
100.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
30.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
85.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
30.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
25.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
55.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
42.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
GENERIC
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low AI content quality → Gemini and GPT will ignore mem.ai, citing competitor data and risking third-party AI visibility.

+
https://www.missiveapp.com
↓ -11
RANK CHANGE
#70 → #81
49.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing your site, leading to competitors being cited instead of your official information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.missiveapp.com
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
62.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
45.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
90.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
35.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
60.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI agents bypassing your site, leading to competitors being cited instead of your official information.

+
https://www.commandbar.com
↑ +17
RANK CHANGE
#99 → #82
45.0
Low content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors or scrapers being cited for your product information.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.commandbar.com
AI Readiness i
48.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
47.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
40.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
100.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
65.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
20.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
45.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
32.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Low content quality → AI models will ignore your site, leading to competitors or scrapers being cited for your product information.

+
https://www.lavender.ai
↓ -5
RANK CHANGE
#78 → #83
43.0
Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring your site, leading them to cite competitor data instead.
WARN
// Detailed metrics — https://www.lavender.ai
AI Readiness i
40.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
45.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
44.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
90.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
70.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
80.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
20.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
50.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
40.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
45.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
30.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
50.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
52.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
VIDEO
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Indexability issues and poor content quality risk AI models like Gemini ignoring your site, leading them to cite competitor data instead.

+
https://www.lottiefiles.com
↓ -74
RANK CHANGE
#10 → #84
0.0
Empty pages for bots → AI models will ignore lottiefiles.com, potentially using competitor data for analysis and insights.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.lottiefiles.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Empty pages for bots → AI models will ignore lottiefiles.com, potentially using competitor data for analysis and insights.

+
https://www.milvus.io
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#79 → #85
0.0
AI bots cannot access your content → LLMs will use competitor data, impacting your brand's online presence and search visibility.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.milvus.io
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI bots cannot access your content → LLMs will use competitor data, impacting your brand's online presence and search visibility.

+
https://www.bettermode.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#80 → #86
0.0
Robots.txt blocks AI bots → Competitors' AI will cite rival content, causing significant third-party risk and loss of official visibility.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.bettermode.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Robots.txt blocks AI bots → Competitors' AI will cite rival content, causing significant third-party risk and loss of official visibility.

+
https://www.orbit.love
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#81 → #87
0.0
AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.orbit.love
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI visibility at risk: Critical blockers detected in L1-L4 layers.

+
https://www.fantastical.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#82 → #88
0.0
HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.fantastical.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.

+
https://www.rewind.ai
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#83 → #89
0.0
HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.rewind.ai
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.

+
https://www.logseq.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#84 → #90
0.0
Empty pages for AI crawlers → LLMs will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.logseq.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Empty pages for AI crawlers → LLMs will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.

+
https://www.polymath.ai
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#85 → #91
0.0
HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.polymath.ai
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will cite competitor blogs to answer queries about your services, bypassing your official site.

+
https://www.noteable.io
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#86 → #92
0.0
Critical content invisibility detected → AI models will ignore your site, potentially citing competitor data for user queries.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.noteable.io
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Critical content invisibility detected → AI models will ignore your site, potentially citing competitor data for user queries.

+
https://www.userpilot.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#87 → #93
0.0
Robots.txt blocks AI bots, causing LLMs to cite competitor data instead of your official site.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.userpilot.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Robots.txt blocks AI bots, causing LLMs to cite competitor data instead of your official site.

+
https://www.chameleon.io
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#88 → #94
0.0
Robots.txt blocks AI bots, causing LLMs to cite competitor content, leading to significant third-party data risk and loss of visibility.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.chameleon.io
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Robots.txt blocks AI bots, causing LLMs to cite competitor content, leading to significant third-party data risk and loss of visibility.

+
https://www.copilot.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#89 → #95
0.0
Empty pages for bots → AI models will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.copilot.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Empty pages for bots → AI models will use competitor data, not yours, to answer user questions.

+
https://www.kustomer.com
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#90 → #96
0.0
Robots.txt blocks AI bots → Competitors' AI may cite rival content, leading to inaccurate or incomplete information about your offerings.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.kustomer.com
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Robots.txt blocks AI bots → Competitors' AI may cite rival content, leading to inaccurate or incomplete information about your offerings.

+
https://www.tome.app
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#91 → #97
0.0
HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will use competitor data, leading to inaccurate or outdated information about your services.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.tome.app
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will use competitor data, leading to inaccurate or outdated information about your services.

+
https://www.gamma.app
↓ -6
RANK CHANGE
#92 → #98
0.0
AI cannot access your content, forcing LLMs to rely on competitor data and potentially misrepresent your offerings.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.gamma.app
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

AI cannot access your content, forcing LLMs to rely on competitor data and potentially misrepresent your offerings.

+
https://www.koala.io
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#97 → #99
0.0
Robots.txt blocks AI bots, forcing LLMs to use competitor data, creating significant third-party risk.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.koala.io
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

Robots.txt blocks AI bots, forcing LLMs to use competitor data, creating significant third-party risk.

+
https://www.height.app
↓ -2
RANK CHANGE
#98 → #100
0.0
HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will ignore your site and use competitor data, posing a significant third-party risk.
FAIL
// Detailed metrics — https://www.height.app
AI Readiness i
0.0
Layers 1–4: Can AI bots access and understand your content?
SEO Foundation i
0.0
Layers 5–6: Can humans and search engines discover you?
Citation Readiness i
0.0
Layer 7: Will AI platforms cite you as authoritative?
L1 Gateway i
0.0
Binary gate: checks if AI bots are allowed in robots.txt.
L2 SSR i
0.0
Server-Side Rendering quality check.
L3 Indexability i
0.0
Penalty system for missing canonical tags, lang attribute, etc.
L4 Content i
0.0
Content quality score based on auto-detected type.
L5 Tech SEO i
0.0
Technical SEO: sitemap, HTTPS, mobile viewport, performance.
L6 On-Page i
0.0
On-Page SEO: Open Graph, Twitter Cards, internal links, image alt.
L7 GPT i
0.0
ChatGPT/OpenAI readiness score.
L7 Gemini i
0.0
Google Gemini readiness score.
L7 Claude i
0.0
Anthropic Claude readiness score.
L7 Perplexity i
0.0
Perplexity AI readiness score.
Content Type i
TECH_HIGH
Auto-detected type for L4 scoring.
⚠ Main Blocker

HTTP access denied for AI bots → AI agents will ignore your site and use competitor data, posing a significant third-party risk.

What does this mean for global technology companies?

AI platforms are becoming the new search engines. Companies that rank high are positioned to capture AI-driven traffic — while those at the bottom risk being invisible to millions of users.

🏆 Top-ranking companies - 21% (Score ≥70)

  • Complete AI bot access: GPTBot, CloudVertexBot, and other AI crawlers can freely index their content
  • Optimized SSR rendering: Server-side rendered pages with proper schema markup ensure AI models can parse content accurately
  • Citation-ready structure: Clean headings, FAQ sections, and structured data make it easy for AI platforms to cite them as authoritative sources
  • Multi-platform visibility: Optimized for all major AI models (GPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity) — not just one
  • Competitive advantage: When users ask AI about their industry, these companies appear first — capturing mindshare and traffic before competitors

⚠️ Mid-tier companies - 62% (Score 40-69)

  • Partial AI bot access: Some AI crawlers blocked while others allowed — inconsistent visibility across platforms
  • Incomplete SSR: Server-side rendering works but with missing meta tags, inconsistent schema markup, or partial implementation
  • Basic schema markup: Structured data exists but isn't optimized for AI citation — missing key fields or using outdated formats
  • Moderate content quality: Content is present but lacks depth, freshness, or the FAQ/heading structure that AI models prefer for citations
  • Competitive disadvantage: Visible to AI systems but rarely cited as authoritative — competitors with better optimization capture the mindshare and traffic

❌ Bottom-ranking companies - 17% (Score <40)

  • Blocked AI bots: robots.txt settings or server errors prevent AI crawlers from accessing content
  • SSR failures: Client-side rendering or missing critical HTML tags make pages invisible to AI models
  • Missing schema markup: Lack of JSON-LD structured data means AI can't understand page context or purpose
  • Thin or outdated content: Short product descriptions, stale blog posts, or missing metadata reduce citation likelihood
  • Lost to competitors: When AI can't cite your site, it defaults to competitors — meaning you lose brand visibility, traffic, and trust in the AI era

Frequently Asked Questions

AI Readiness
Measures if AI bots can access and understand your content (Layers 1–4).
SEO Foundation
Measures technical and on-page SEO quality (Layers 5–6).
Citation Readiness
Measures how likely AI platforms are to cite your content (Layer 7).
PASS
Overall score ≥70. The site meets AI citation readiness baseline.
WARN
Overall score 40–69. Partial readiness with incomplete citation signals.
FAIL
Overall score <40. Critical blocking issues prevent AI indexing.

What is the AI Visibility Score?

The AI Visibility Score (0–100) measures how well a website is structured for discovery and citation by AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. It combines three components: AI Readiness (L1–L4), SEO Foundation (L5–L6), and Citation Readiness (L7), each weighted equally at 33.3%.

Why do some websites score 0?

A score of 0 indicates a critical blocker at Layer 1 (Gateway) or Layer 2 (SSR). This means AI bots are explicitly blocked in robots.txt, the server returns an error, or the page fails to render essential HTML elements. When these gates fail, all downstream scoring stops.

What does PASS, WARN, and FAIL mean?

PASS (score ≥70) means the site meets the baseline threshold for AI citation readiness. WARN (40–69) indicates partial readiness — AI bots can access the site but citation signals are incomplete. FAIL (<40) means critical blocking issues prevent AI platforms from indexing or citing the content.

How is Citation Readiness measured?

Citation Readiness (Layer 7) evaluates platform-specific signals for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. It checks bot access permissions, structured data quality, E-E-A-T signals (author, dates, contact), and answer-engine optimization elements like FAQ sections and question-format headings. The final score is an average across all four platforms.

How can a company improve its score?

The most impactful improvements are: allowing AI bots in robots.txt (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot), implementing JSON-LD structured data, ensuring server-side rendering of critical HTML elements, adding FAQ sections and question-format headings, and including author attribution with publication dates. VerisAI provides a detailed runbook with prioritized fixes for each layer.